Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1185

reference
890-tree-1
name
1185
tree-preservation-order

undefined

890-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.017655 50.879223)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.017599 50.879217,-1.017601 50.879228,-1.017609 50.879239,-1.017621 50.879247,-1.017637 50.879252,-1.017655 50.879254,-1.017672 50.879252,-1.017688 50.879247,-1.017701 50.879239,-1.017709 50.879229,-1.017712 50.879218,-1.017710 50.879207,-1.017702 50.879197,-1.017689 50.879189,-1.017674 50.879184,-1.017656 50.879182,-1.017639 50.879183,-1.017623 50.879188,-1.017610 50.879196,-1.017602 50.879206,-1.017599 50.879217)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL